Monday Musings: Babies and TV – Do They Go Together?

I admit that I grew up in a time when we didn’t watch a lot of videos.  In fact, I remember when we got our first VCR – it was a big deal!  Before that, it was strictly rabbit ears and public television.  I saw a lot of Sesame Street, School House Rock, and cartoons and that was about it.  (Granted, some of those cartoons were the now-banned Briar Rabbit and other Disney classics, but that’s a discussion for another day.)  

I think today’s world is a little bit different from the one I was raised in.  Kids not only have their own TVs, DVD players, and movie collections, but it’s all portable and travels with them in the backseat of the mini-van.  There are also probably 50 shows that cater to children, compared to the two or three that I may have watched.  

I’m thinking about this topic because today I recently read a story from CNN/TIME called: TV For Babies: Does It Help or Hurt?  Now the article and the quoted research seems to be geared towards children who are under the age of two.  From what I read, I understand that there are programs out there that target this specific age with the idea that it will help their development.  So I looked up a couple of these programs.  Baby Einstein has products for the two and under set (and older)

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

 

and Brainy Baby has products for children five and under.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Sounds pretty good right?  Get a child’s education started early so that he/she will get used to learning and will grow developmentally too.  The problem, at least according to the article, is that there isn’t enough conclusive evidence to show that these learning programs are effective.  In fact, the research that has been done does not show an increase or decrease in ability.  What it does show is that these abilities are often affected by the parent’s education and their communication habits with their children.

Interesting.  Another article I found (Baby Einstein: Not So Smart After All) stated that babies who watch DVDs and TV scored 10 percent lower on language skills than those who did not watch the videos.  This article went on to say that a lot of it has to do with the amount of time that a baby/child spends with humans because they learn through face-to-face interaction.  

I have to say that I’m a bit confused.  The articles cite specific research, but there aren’t a lot of conclusive data and the data they do cite are somewhat ambiguous.  And the websites selling these products make the programs sound so good and point out that they have been featured on such shows as Oprah, the Today Show, and Good Morning America.  I don’t know about you, but usually when the New York Times and the Washington Post feature something, I tend to think it’s okay.

So what’s the answer?  I honestly don’t know.  What do you think about playing videos for your babies?  Does it help or is it not any good?



Share/Save/Bookmark

Mindee - March 9, 2009 - 5:19 am

Whether it helped or hurt, all I know is that Baby Einstein helped me to get dinner on the table and the occasional shower. Totally worth an IQ point or two. ;)

Julie - March 9, 2009 - 5:20 am

For babies, no. Over 2, in small doses. My nephew, now 3, has loved Thomas and Bob the Builder since he was bout 2 and a half. But he only got to watch one of each a day. Total of one hour a day. I watched Sesame Street before I was 5. And let’s face it, we all say we don’t think the TV should be a babysitter but we all have or will do it at least once. But really should try not to do it at all when they are that young. Babies need a lot more interaction than older children do. That’s how they develop language, early social skills, etc. Videos really can’t do that.

Joanna - March 9, 2009 - 5:31 am

Hee. I love how innocently you posed that question …

With my first, we did not watch any TV when she was awake. Mainly due to my reading Buy, Buy Baby: How Consumer Culture Manipulates Parents and Harms Young Minds right before she was born. (Nice, innocuous title, right?) Well, I didn’t watch any TV while she was awake. My husband could not be convinced of the brain melting powers of television and stubbornly continued to watch his ESPN. :)

When my daughter was six months old, I found out I was pregnant with our second child … and morning sickness took over my world for three months. Clifford, Curious George, Miss Spider, Little Bill–you name it and she watched it. Devoured it. Loved it.

Now, we have a little bit of TV time most days when it is really cold or rainy and playing outside isn’t an option. I try to limit the viewing to shows that are spin-offs of books (like those listed above); we watch a specific show (or two) and then turn the TV off. And my son could care less. Perhaps because he’s seen so much more TV at a young age than my daughter.

But I don’t see the television as teaching my children anything. If there’s something I want them to learn, I don’t search out a video to try to teach them. The TV serves as a bit of distraction so I can get a little picking up done. I try to watch in the same room and make comments about the shows and we usually discuss what happened in each story afterward to try to get a little bit of brain activity, but it is essentially a babysitter. Which is a little hard for me to admit because I’m not a big fan of the TV. But it is just another one of those Parenting Compromises I swore I would never, ever make! :) Ah, well.

(And for the record … my kids are two and one years old.)

Rachel - March 9, 2009 - 5:42 am

It’s all about moderation. We don’t have TV because 1. we can’t afford the bill right now (darn student loans) and 2. we really have no desire to watch anything! So my daughter watches very little TV. We have a few Baby Einstein and Sesame Street DVDs that we’ll put in maybe twice a week so that I can just chill out for 30 minutes. I don’t think it hurts. She gets plenty of personal interaction and loves to read books. A good balance is key I think.

the domestic fringe - March 9, 2009 - 5:51 am

Honestly I just don’t think a baby needs television. My theory has always been if you start kids off with lots of fast-paced entertainment, they will never be content with simple. I worked at keeping things extremely simple during their very young years and I think I’m reaping the benefits now. I see what my peers to through to entertain their children and I’m thankful for simple. If you start big, you need to top that with every year – more engaging, more speed, more color…it’s not just with the TV either.

-FringeGirl

the weakonomist - March 9, 2009 - 5:58 am

There is a balance between too much TV and simply just watching something fun. With the introduction of DVRs, there is a new benefit. Kids are like dogs (sorry!) in that they know of schedules despite not understanding what time is at all. They know when they’re favorite show is about to come on. With a DVR they can watch at any time, which means they won’t know when it’s on. This will make it easier to pull a kid away from TV.

No I don’t have kids, however I have friends with kids and can see it in action.

admin - March 9, 2009 - 6:14 am

Mindee – Ha! Aptly stated, as always!

Julie – I agree that babies definitely need that extra human interaction.

Joanna – :) It’s so hard to sound unbiased but in this case, I’m not 100% sure what I would do. I didn’t even know they had videos for babies! I think I’ll check out that book you mentioned though, sounds like interesting reading.

Rachel – you’re right, balance is definitely key.

Domestic Fringe – that’s an interesting point. I’ve seen that with some of the older children I know. They have the latest gadgets and video games and are always on them. Whether it’s because they started young or because of their friends, I don’t know.

Weakonomist – another interesting point. That’s true, kids do know when their favorite shows are on so a DVR might help keep the schedule in the hands of the parent.

Robynn's Ravings - March 9, 2009 - 6:19 am

Nothing takes the place (or should) of the fascinating world of your baby interacting with you and using all his/her senses. I didn’t put my babies in front of the tv. I’m thrilled with the results. As toddlers they did watch wholesome videos and loved “Barney” and “Tellytubbies.” They have fond memories of both. I think the push to make babies super intelligent is building the house before the foundation has been laid. Might look great but eventually they will find some huge mistakes have been made.

The Wife of Odie - March 9, 2009 - 6:35 am

I have no clue as I don’t have children, but I definitely don’t want my baby watching much TV. It just makes sense that a baby would learn more from actual interaction than starring at a box.

Isabelle - March 9, 2009 - 8:04 am

No kids, no TV.

Toni and I both grew up without TV up to a certain age. And as young adults we both independently found out that we are TV-addicted. So, we decided, no TV in our house. For a long time we thought we were quite cured, but during vacations we realized that we use time in the vacation homes (in the evenings) in front of the box ;-((( And lately TV has sneaked again into our home via internet etc. Currently we are planning ways to deal with the addiction, because it is harming our home-life.

Kristy - March 9, 2009 - 8:34 am

We don’t put on videos for babies, but when Kate was 2-1/2 I started letting her watch Sesame Street. Sometimes Gabby (now about 1-1/2 will watch some, but not all of it. We’re pretty conservative on TV watching for our kids.

Joanna - March 9, 2009 - 8:49 am

Isabelle – We have the same problem in our family. Before we had kids, we’d have a beautiful Spring weekend and around Sunday at 7pm, my husband and I would realize that we’d done nothing but sit inside flipping channels. And we wouldn’t even remember what we watched!!!! It’s a constant temptation to just lose myself in front of the TV and I fight to keep it from happening to my kids as well. (My daughter could probably zone out for hours watching TV.) My husband won’t get rid of the TV, but at least now that we have kids, he realizes that he doesn’t want to encourage that kind of behavior in them so we try to be aware of the time the television is on while they are awake. Which has the added benefit of forcing us to look for other entertainment opportunities!

Sabrina - March 9, 2009 - 8:59 am

I don’t think that there’s a right or wrong answer to your questions, it’s all a personal choice. I didn’t play videos for my kids when they were babies, but I admit that I did turn on Barney, Sesame Street of Winnie the Pooh when I was trying to get dressed or get a shower or just for a distraction when necessary.

As toddlers, they both watched in moderation but I do agree that you can’t just park them in front of the TV and expect them to learn. They need the interaction with you and if you are that kind of parent(and I’m sure you will be) then they’ll be just fine, no matter what. :-)

My kids both loved to read books with us and play with their toys. They had great imaginations. They actually both turned out very intelligent. My son, who is a freshman in high school just got 28 on the ACT so I don’t think he was damaged by watching TV when he was little. :-)

Kristina - March 9, 2009 - 9:34 am

I’m not really sure. I do think that kids tend to be really overstimulated, and I’m not sure if this is really effective on young babies.

Sarah @ BecomingSarah.com - March 9, 2009 - 9:46 am

I grew up without television, period. None. We had a set and sometimes, if the VCR cooperated, when we were sick my mom would let us watch one video. But that was it. My parents didn’t go out and buy a television set until September 11th happened, and only then because they wanted to watch the news.

Having grown up without television, and being the sort who has never been able to acclimate to television in the way that most people have, I can say this: there are disadvantages. You would not believe the number of references in this culture to pop TV programs that I have never heard of – and the number of other ones that I’ve heard of but never seen. I don’t usually know who celebrities are and when people say “you know that movie,” or show or song or whatever…I don’t. When I met my husband, he made me watch a couple episodes of the Simpsons just so that I at least knew who Bart Simpson WAS. But he gave up trying to pop-culture-ize me when he found out that I didn’t know who Tina Turner was a few weeks later. Now he just doesn’t reference TV around me lol.

So that’s the disadvantage. Being clueless. And also, not having any sense of correct pronunciation. I may know how to use a word, but if you never hear the word out loud, you’re going to say it wrong. Alot.

But the advantages are countless. I was always able to entertain myself as a child – seriously, I can’t think of a single time I was bored, my imagination was company enough. And I was a huge reader, which did manifest itself in higher grades and test scores purely because information at school was rarely new to me. I’ve always had confidence in my ability to learn anything I want without a classroom.

And the most significant of all is probably this: self-image.

I don’t care what anybody else says, if you are not bombarded with images of beautiful people, you have no reason to believe that you are not. I’m not the sort to believe that ads and TV are the roots of all evil, but I do think that television is a fantasy and most children cannot always discern between that fantasy and the reality they face day in and day out.

Sarah @ BecomingSarah.com - March 9, 2009 - 9:49 am

Wow, that’s a long comment. Sorry. It seems that I can’t help but write an essay whenever I stop by here!

Sarah - March 9, 2009 - 12:33 pm

I can relate with Sarah @ BecomingSarah.com. I grew up without any TV channels but I don’t in anyway feel there are disadvantages to that. We had a VCR and for the most part were only allowed to watch videos on the weekends. You don’t miss much not having a TV. Most of the shows and commercials on these day are not something I would ever watch. When I need a TV fix I can always watch Hell’s Kitchen, Survivor, and House online without any commercials, otherwise I’m usually reading a book.

Heidi - March 9, 2009 - 12:51 pm

Nice comment, Sarah. Riveting! I read every word of it!

Were your parents hippies?

Frig, I almost made a pop culture reference. I almost said, “Your folks sound like Dharma’s folks?” As in Dharma from Dharma & Greg, a late 90s sitcom starring Jenna Elfman and Thomas Gibson. :)

Did your parents simply boycott television? Or was your family of the mountain-hiking variety that helped dig public gardens in city green spaces?

I was a tomboy who grew up in the sticks of Western NY. People would give my father their old run-down mopeds, four-wheelers and snowmobiles and he’d fix them up for me and sisters to play with in the grape fields behind our house. We spent a lot of time outside – even in the winter. Especially in the winter.

We certainly had a TV, and in fact, as a toddler I once crawled behind it and fell asleep, sending my parents into a frenzied search for my whereabouts. I’d be lying if I didn’t say I grew up watching TV, since I can recall episodes of Romper Room and random PBS programming. As a bigger kid I watched The Cosby Show, Full House, Family Matters, that sort of thing …

I wasn’t glued to the boob tube. There were other more exciting things to do and I’m not even sure if I felt this way because my parents nudged me away from it, or because I was just a scrappy kid who liked playing outside.

My little sister, PK, however is a different story. She LOVED TV. Camped out for hours on the couch on a Saturday afternoon watching TV. I mostly blame MTV. We didn’t get cable until I was in college, so I only watched MTV smut at friend’s houses. My younger sister however was in 8th grade when my parents sprung for a Direct TV, so well … she devoured the crap.

MTV turned her into a TV zombie and it rubbed off on my parents as well. Before we had cable no one gave a shit about Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey’s televised romance. After my dad purchased 99 channels, it was all they could watch. It was my FATHER who first watched Jessica Simpson contemplate Chicken of the Sea. Not me. Not my sisters. Not my mom. My father.

Anyway Tabitha. To answer your question, I think television is fine. I think MTV is the devil.

And Sarah, phew you thought your comment was epic.

As for pop culture references, I subscribed to MANY magazines as a teen. I wanted to be a celebrity journalist so I read Interview, Esquire, Talk, (the old, non-tabloid) US Weekly and Vanity Fair. Everything I learned from pop culture I attribute to these magazines. Not TV.

BTW: I read the magazines outside. In a tree. Like a cliche.

Eryn - March 9, 2009 - 2:52 pm

1. Moderation. I try to keep it to an hour or less a day for my son.

2. Age-appropriateness (is that a word?). My 2-year-old does not watch cartoons geared toward 10-year-olds.

3. No over-stimulation. Some shows (many, many non-PBS shows) are just wayyyy too overstimulating. The scene changes every 7 seconds or less, things are flashing, exploding, yelling, etc. We stay away from that.

4. PBS!!!! Sesame Street is still a great one; it is very basic and somewhat slow-moving, so it’s not going to form bad connections in your kids’ brains. Superwhy! is great too; it is totally educational and kids love the songs and characters. PBS is golden. Bob the Builder, Thomas the Tank Engine, etc.

5. We avoid Nickelodeon. Those shows for the most part have no value. Spongebob is funny but completely weird and creepy and worthless.

We did use Baby Einstein and Praise Baby but I don’t think it makes kids smarter. It’s mostly for the parents. That was the only way I showered for a looooong time.

Briony - March 9, 2009 - 3:47 pm

we weren’t really allowed to watch much TV growing up either, at least when it was nice out and we could be playing outdoors. my dad is very creative so he always encouraged us to use our imaginations and not fix all our attention on someone else’s imagination come to life. on top of all our creative juices being stretched: we both took dace classes, played sports and took piano lessons. when it comes to advanced learning i think it is all about balance and moderation. you have to give them room to grow in all areas not just fixate on one.

Ali - March 9, 2009 - 7:38 pm

Obviously less (tv) is more. Real life interactions are definately better, but I have to agree with Mindee – sometimes you just need a half-hour to get dinner on the table!

We watch far too much TV – and we don’t even have cable!
But Tt will know the most off-hand things about plants, space, whatever from watching copies of Magic School Bus and things like that. We also have a number of documentaries. It can work well as an educational aid I must say.

I’m totally addicted to DVD tv shows and movies – I watch HOURS. I blame it on not being allowed to watch TV or go to movies when I was growing up – I’m over-compensating now ;-) .

erin - March 9, 2009 - 8:51 pm

I’ve read/heard that tv stunts brain development in kids/babies under 2. After that… . If it were up to me the kiddo would not know tv exists until she is 36. As for staying informed, she can read the newspaper.

When I was a kid we were not allowed to just veg in front of the tv, and I’m really hoping I don’t turn into one of those moms who allows the tv to be a babysitter. My sister and I were STRONGLY ENCOURAGED to get out and run around, ride bikes, swing on the swingset, play in the sand, whatever. On those rare rainy days, gotta love SoCal, we were doing crafts indoors or holed up with books. We did have movie nights at our house and I distinctly remember being a bit older and watching The Cosby Show together as a family, but tv was never something that was all-consuming in our house. It was just kind of there, an extra.

Now DH – comes home at night and turns the tv on. Plops down in his recliner and quite happily watches 3 hours of ESPN A NIGHT. I kid you not. It drives me insane. Sure, I have my favorite shows that I watch religiously, but I could not sit in front of the tv for that long. I would go batty. Even the sound of the television (we have an “older” tv with a CRT and it makes that high-pitched whine, am I completely insane or does anyone else hear that?) drives me up a wall. Consequently I am often in another room reading or sewing or puttering around aimlessly while he watches tv, and yes I do hate it sometimes. On the other hand, I can very easily misplace 3 hours reading blogs online, so. :)

Dennis - March 10, 2009 - 9:54 am

The study everyone keeps talking about that cites a loss of vocabulary and that DVDs will turn your kids brian into jelly have a lot of erroneous facts surrounding it, and has been promoted as a fear based agenda for far too long. There are scores of positive and real scientific research available to suggest that media viewing for children can actually have a very positive influence. In fact, when you count and look at all the research on this subject, there is an overwhelming amount of positive research that other Universities have performed.

The key is content. My children were raised on quality, educational videos and they definately learned all their basics from videos. DVD’s are just one more tool in the parent’s learning bag and should be viewed as a healthy component to assist in developing a “love of learning” for their child. I believe in parental interaction and other forms of imaginative play, however to completely dismiss DVD’s in view of all the positive research is really throwing out the baby with the bath water.

Even the AAP has said that their policy on media viewing is “just to be on the safe side” and states that it cannot support their policy scientifically (see AAP web site for exact quote).

I wouldn’t exactly cut the cord off the TV yet and as a parent I wouldn’t feel guilty if you use a video.

Sarah @ BecomingSarah.com - March 11, 2009 - 9:27 am

I disagree wholeheartedly with the Sarah who posted after me. There are some disadvantages to not participating in one of the favored activities of your culture.

(Also, no, Heidi, my parents weren’t hippies. My parents both grew up with access to television. They just felt that their quality of life was better without television in their lives, something I absolutely believe to be true.)

First of all, I think that the other Sarah overestimates the amount of TV we had access to. Our VCR didn’t work well, and wouldn’t always be able to make the epic effort to finish a movie, much less start one. I can count on one hand the number of films I watched as a kid. Literally. So when I say I had no television, I mean there was NO TELEVISION. And yeah, there have been disadvantages.

They just haven’t outweighed the advantages, that’s all.

As far as disadvantages go, though, here’s a thought nugget. When I watch TV, having never acclimated to it, I have unbelievable nightmares. Oh my god, the nightmares. My mood changes, the feel of a show or movie lingers with me, my sleep pattern changes, I interact with people differently, I feel more isolated and less upbeat. And did I mention the nightmares? It takes awhile to get back to feeling normal. And that’s if I watch a two-hour movie or a one-hour show. All of which are actually considered average problems that people like me deal with when we’re not acclimated to television on any level.

Oh, and did I mention the nightmares?

There are drawbacks to not watching any television ever. It’s just that they don’t outweigh the advantages in my opinion, but that I feel other people should be aware of them. I personally feel it’s all about balance and moderation.

Alzo - March 11, 2009 - 7:34 pm

I don’t have too much of an opinion on this because I don’t have any little ones yet, but I am impressed by the comments of your other readers above. There are obviously some strong feelings and expert opinions among your readers. Great to see so many caring moms and dads commenting.

Ambulance Mommy - March 16, 2009 - 9:47 am

I might have a really different perspective from other parents, but a particular DVD series has been life altering for us, and I WISH that other parents would consider them

Signing Time (www.signingtime.com) is an instructional DVD series that teaches families (not just babies) sign language in a fun, easy way that incorporates audio, visual and tactile methods.

We started showing them to my son BEFORE we knew he was hard of hearing, and he totally loved them! We were teaching him a new language, and learning it ourselves at the same time, and I can’t think of a better family activity than learning together.

Then we found out about his hearing, and we were so thankful that we had given him a way to communicate with us.

Giving your child means to communicate with you is a key part of parenting….and not all TV has to be bad. My son watches this series to help him, but I still would let him watch it even if he wasn’t hard of hearing.

I reccomend sign language for every single parent I know, not just because I think its a cool fad, or something neat to do, because I know first hand how ANY communication with your child is good communication, and babies really can communicate with you before they can talk!

I hope the people who decide against all TV for their kids can reconsider when they consider the possibility for education like this….you never know when you might need it.

(ps…sign language is also fun when as a parent you can spell out words to your spouse without a whole crowd of people knowing what you are saying! Like “Ok, can we just get out of this lame party now? :) )

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

There was an error submitting your comment. Please try again.

CommentLuv badge
B l o g r o l l
C a t e g o r i e s
M y   B u t t o n
R e t u r n   H O M E